|
|
Exhibits
- Page 1. Exhibit #1. Original Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed in the District
Court on March 8, 2007. (286 KB)
- Page 12. Exhibit #2. Trial Court’s Order Upon Government’s Motion to Limit Defendants’
Proof at Trial, dated October 25, 1982. (265 KB)
- Page 14. Exhibit #3. Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition
for Habeas Corpus, filed on February 26, 2007. (389 KB)
- Page 16. Exhibit
#4. Letter from Clerk of District Court returning filing fee of
$5, date unknown (sometime between March 3, 2007 and March 8, 2007). (4254 KB)
- Page 17. Exhibit
#5. The Magistrate’s Recommended Decision, dated March 19, 2007.
(202 KB)
- Page 20. Exhibit
#6. The Petitioner’s Objection to the Magistrate’s Recommended
Decision, filed on March 21, 2007. (256 KB)
- Page 28. Exhibit
#7. The District Court’s Order Affirming the Recommended Decision
of the Magistrate Judge, dated April 10, 2007. (197 KB)
- Page 30. Exhibit
#8. Relevant portions of the Legislative History of the Controlled
Substances Act of 1970, House Report 91-1444, Sept. 10, 1970. (401 KB)
- Page 34. Exhibit
#9. Relevant portions of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970,
Public Law 91-513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1236. (457 KB)
- Page 38. Exhibit
#10. Relevant portions of the Report of the Presidential Commission
on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, dated March 22, 1972 and March 22, 1972. (788 KB)
- Page 50. Exhibit
#11. Volume 51, Federal Register, Pages 17476-17478, transferring
the principle psychoactive ingredient in marijuana from Schedule I of the CSA to
Schedule II of the CSA. (544 KB)
- Page 53. Exhibit
#12. The Findings of Fact of the Administrative Law Judge in the
Matter of Marijuana Rescheduling Petition, DEA Docket No. 86-22, September 6, 1988.
(581 KB)
- Page 63. Exhibit
#13. Volume 64, Federal Register, Pages 35928-35930, transferring
the principle psychoactive ingredient in marijuana from Schedule II of the CSA to
Schedule III of the CSA. (233 KB)
- Page 66. Exhibit
#14. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Administrative
Law Judge in the Matter of Lyle E. Craker, Ph.D, DEA Docket No. 05-16, February
12, 2007. (610 KB)
First Circuit Local Rules
General Docket
United States Court of Appeals |
|
Court of Appeals Docket #: 07-2310 |
Docketed: 08/24/2007
Termed: 03/21/2008 |
|
In Re: Olsen, et al |
|
Appeal From: District Court of Maine, Bangor |
|
|
Case Type Information: |
|
1) original proceeding |
|
2) mandamus (fee not paid) |
|
3) - |
|
|
|
|
Originating Court Information: |
|
District: 0100-1 : 07-00034 |
|
Ordering Judge: John A. Woodcock, U.S. District Judge
|
|
Trial Judge: Margaret J. Kravchuk, Magistrate Judge
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
Panel Assignment: Not available
|
|
|
In re: CARL E. OLSEN
Petitioner
|
Carl E. Olsen
[LD NTC Pro Se]
130 East Aurora Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50313-3654 |
|
IN RE: CARL E. OLSEN
Petitioner
|
|
08/24/2007 |
|
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Opening forms sent. Petition filed by Petitioner Carl
E. Olsen in 07-2310. Appearance form due 9/7/07. [07-2310] |
|
08/24/2007 |
|
PETITION For Writ of Mandamus filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen in 07-2310. Certificate
of Service dated 8/20/07 . [07-2310] |
|
08/24/2007 |
|
EXHIBIT List filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen. [1280957-1] [07-2310] |
|
09/06/2007 |
|
MOTION filed via Fax by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen in 07-2310 to proceed in forma
pauperis, Certificate of service dated 9/1/07 . [07-2310] |
|
09/07/2007 |
|
PUBLIC NOTE: Hard Copy of Petitioner's motion to proceed with Petition for Writ
of Mandamus in forma pauperis arrived today. [1285009-1] [07-2310] |
|
09/10/2007 |
|
MOTION filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen in 07-2310 to proceed in forma pauperis,
Certificate of service dated 9/1/07 . [07-2310] |
|
09/19/2007 |
|
ORDER entered by Judge Sandra L. Lynch: The motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis is denied. Petitioner shall pay the filing fee on or before September 28,
2007 or this petition will be dismissed. [07-2310] |
|
09/25/2007 |
|
FILING FEE PAID by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen in 07-2310. Receipt No. 015851. Amount:
$450. [07-2310] |
|
11/02/2007 |
|
PUBLIC NOTE: Judicial Notice filed by Petitioner Carl Eric Olsen informing the court
that he has filed his brief with the 8th Circuit. He has supplied the court with
a copy. [07-2310] |
|
11/08/2007 |
|
MOTION filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen in 07-2310 Judicial Notice informing the
court that a motion for reconsideration was filed in the 8th circuit and granted.Certificate
of Service of service dated 11/5/07 . [07-2310] |
|
11/26/2007 |
|
PUBLIC NOTE: Motion For Judicial Notice filed by appellant Carl Eric Olsen informing
the court that he has filed a motion for reconsideration of orders. [07-2310] |
|
01/02/2008 |
|
Request for Judicial Notice filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen in 07-2310 providing
the court with a courtesy copy the reply brief for the appellant filed in the 8th
circuit. Certificate of service dated 12/28/07 . [07-2310] |
|
01/04/2008 |
|
CASE SUBMITTED . Lynch, Lipez, Howard, Circuit Judges. [07-2310] |
|
03/21/2008 |
|
JUDGMENT entered by Judge Sandra L. Lynch, Judge Kermit V. Lipez, Judge Jeffrey
R. Howard: "[I]t is well-established that an extraordinary writ, such as ...
a writ of mandamus, may not be used as a substitute for an appeal and will not lie
if an appeal is an available remedy." In re Urohealth Sys., Inc. 252 F.3d 504,
507 (1st Cir. 2001). As petitioner Carl E. Olsen has an appeal available (Appeal
No. 07-1883) in which to argue that the district court erred in not treating his
filing as a petition for writ of coram nobis, this petition for writ of mandamus
is denied. [1345606-1] [07-2310] |
|
04/28/2008 |
|
PETITION filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
Certificate of service dated 04/24/2008. [07-2310]
|
|
04/29/2008 |
|
ELECTRONIC Document containing Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion For Rehearing
En Banc filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen. [07-2310]
|
|
05/07/2008 |
|
ORDER entered by Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge denying petition for rehearing
and rehearing en banc filed by Petitioner Carl E. Olsen. [07-2310]
|
|
|