Iowa District Court
Muscatine County, Iowa
State of Iowa v. Carl Eric Olsen
Case No. 738-578
May 28, 1982
MELANIE DREHER,
called as a witness on behalf of the Defendant, after being first duly sworn by
the Court, was examined and testified as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. COOK:
Q. Miss Dreher, for the benefit of
all involved, would you make sure that all of your responses are oral and loud enough
so that we can all hear you, please.
A. Sure.
Q. Would you please give your full
name, your address and your occupation to the Court.
A. It's Dr. Melanie Dreher.
I live in New York. Do you want a specific address?
Q. No, that's fine.
A. I'm assistant professor at Columbia
University.
Q. What is your major field of expertise,
Miss Dreher?
A. I have a Ph.D in anthropology.
Q. Would you give the Court a brief
background of your educational experience?
A. My doctorate in anthropology is
from Columbia University; that included several periods of research in Jamaica and
the West Indies. I started doing research on chronic marijuana use there in
1969 and have continued off and on for the last ten years.
I have done a second study of childhood marijuana
use in 1980 and '81, and currently have a proposal in with the Federal Government
to study the effects of marijuana smoking on pregnancy and lactation and neonatal
health.
I have also been a postdoctorate fellow for the National
Institute on Drug Abuse and have a joint-appointment with Teacher's College at Columbia
University.
Q. Dr. Dreher, what was your doctoral
dissertation entitled?
A. The title of the dissertation,
which is now published as a book, is Working Men and Ganja.
Q. Was this based upon your study
of the use of Gania in Jamaica and the West Indies?
A. This was based upon that study
of three rural Jamaican communities in the Parish of St. Thomas; comparing the use
by farmers of marijuana in those three communities.
Q. Do you belong to any professional
societies?
A. I belong to the American Anthropological
Association, the Society for Applied Anthropology, the Northeastern Anthropological
Association, American Public Health Association.
Q. Have you published other works
or magazine articles in a professional capacity?
A. Yes, I have. I'm sorry I
can't give you the references right now. One is due to be published in Human
Organization, one is published in the West Indian Journal, and I've given several
papers, about four of which have been published in the proceedings of those meetings.
Q. Dr. Dreher, have you been recognized
as an expert witness in any federal court?
A. Yes, I have, in Miami and in Springfield,
Massachusetts.
Q. Have you been recognized in any
state courts as an expert witness?
A. I don't think so, no.
MR. COOK: Perhaps
we could ask the Judge to recognize you as an expert witness.
THE COURT: I would
acknowledge that.
Q. Miss Dreher, on your studies of
-- first of all, tell the Court what is Ganja?
A. Ganja is the Jamaican term for
cannabis or marijuana. It has an East Indian name because it was brought to
Jamaica by East Indians following manumission.
Q. Is that a pile of Ganja that we
have here in front of us? Can you tell or does it appear to be?
A. Well, I can't tell from here.
It smells as though it is.
Q. In your studies in Jamaica did
you ever have occasion to become involved with the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church?
A. Yes, I did. In my second
study, which took place in 1979, 1980, '81, I went back to the area where I had
done previous field work, which was in St. Thomas. And one of the properties
that had been owned by the Post Mistress (phonetic) and White Horses had been purchased
by a group called the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church. This was about a 1,500
acre parcel of land.
I asked local residents about the church, and they
said that they had cleared the land, established several head of -- hundred head
of cattle on the land and were essentially large -- currently large farmers in the
area.
Q. Did you have occasion to do a
professional study of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church?
A. Well, I studied the church peripherally
from the point of view of the outside community when I was -- or the larger community
when I was doing that study. But I never had a chance to study the church
internally.
I was employed by Ramsey Clark to testify for the
church at which point, I said I could not testify until I did at least a small study
of the church.
Q. Did you undertake specifically
to go back to Jamaica, I take it a third time, to specifically study this church?
A. I went back, actually, three more
times to look at that church. I went in December of 1979, March -- not '79,
'80 -- March of '81 and April of '81. '81 -- sorry, it's '80. It is
'80.
Q. Approximately how much time did
you spend studying the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church?
A. Altogether close to two weeks.
Q. Did you do any research on this
particular church outside of your field study?
A. As opposed to that -- I'm sorry?
Q. Did you do any library research
or --
A. Oh, yes. I researched in
the sense that I had to compare it to other Rastafarian movements and put it into
the context of West Indian religion and Jamaican religion, specifically.
Q. Dr. Dreher, is there a commonly
accepted definition of a religion?
A. There are several commonly accepted
definitions of religion. Probably the most accepted one is that it is an organized
system of belief and practice which recognizes sacred objects and belief in a supernatural
being, and it also has to -- there has to be a church in -- not a physical church
in that sense, but a group of individuals who share that belief and which includes
both laymen and priests.
Q. Compared to that definition of
a church, did you analyze the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. What did you find? What
were the results that you arrived at when you held the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church
up to that standard?
A. That the Ethiopian Zion Coptic
Church falls well within the definition of religion, and certainly in its earlier
stages of religious development, in the sense that it may not be as formalized as
some of our more traditional religions like Catholicism or Protestantism, but it
would be comparable to Protestantism in the earlier days of the reformation, but
certainly well within the definition of religion.
Q. Did you find a group of people
practicing this religion?
A. Yes, I did. I found, actually,
two groups of people; one located in White Horses in Jamaica and -- where many of
them resided on a gospel camp and there were others who resided outside the camp
as well, and then another group at Star Island in Miami.
Q. Did you find a belief in a supernatural
being as an integral part of the tenets of that church?
A. Yes, there is. The church
is basically a Christian church. According to the doctrine of this church,
the mantle of prophecy was passed from Jesus to his disciples and then for several
hundred years this prophecy was hidden from black men. Then it was passed
to Marcus Garvey, who was a political and religious leader in Jamaica and other
West Indian islands in the late 1920s and '30s.
Then that mantle of prophecy was passed from Marcus
Garvey to the founder of the church, who was Louva Williams.
Q. Can you describe for the Court
briefly what the basic premise of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church -- what is the
basic tendency of that church?
A. There are a few. One has to do
with the concept of Jesus, which they have conceptualized as Jes-us, meaning that
Jesus is within every man. They do not believe in a -- what they would call
a Sky God or a God up in heaven; that when you die you are going to go up there.
They believed that in each of us there is a deity
and consequently, that every time one man is in communication with another man,
he is in communication, essentially, with God and with Jesus.
Another concept is the -- the sort of -- how would
you describe it -- the duality of the religion, which derives, certainly, from the
King James verson of the bible, but then again from a hidden prophet -- or the prophecy
that was hidden for so many years from black men, that has to do with the juxtaposition
of good and evil, natural and unnatural, clean and unclean. So that things
that are -- are natural are also good, they are holy and sacred.
Ganja is a -- considered a sacred object in the church
along with the King James version of the bible, and as a sacred object has taken
the place of -- has assumed the position of being the sacrament of the church.
Q. Dr. Dreher, in your studies of
the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church did you ever hear a term called "a life of
living"?
A. I can't say I did, actually.
Q. Have you ever heard a term to
describe the life style that the individual members must subscribe to?
A. Well, I -- certainly, it could-be
described in more than one term. They would describe their life style by many
terms I believe; natural, good, holy, righteous.
Q. Would you describe their life
style as being a strict religion?
A. They are an extremely moralistic,
extremely rigid religion, I think, in comparison with other religions.
The members are not permitted to dance, they are not
permitted, really, to have any kind of social or recreational activities.
The women are required to wear long dresses, cover their heads, or at least cover
their hair. Women are not permitted to wear makeup. Neither men nor
women wear jewelry, with the exception of perhaps a watch.
The men are expected not -- are prohibited from trimming
their hair, so that they let their hair grow, and they also -- or from trimming
beards as well.
They are, in that respect, similar to other Rastafarian
movements, except that other Rastafarians leave their hair in what they call dreadlocks
and the Ethiopian Zion members insist on combing their hair and they do not wear
dreadlocks.
Q. Is there a prohibition or proscription
concerning diet in this particular religion?
A. They obey most of the dietary
laws outlined in Leviticus in the Old Testament so that they are not permitted to
eat pork, for example, or any crustaceans. The beef has to be killed in a
certain way and that is by hanging the cow -- cattle upside down, then slitting
the throat and letting the blood drain out on the ground.
They eat food that is natural and unfertilized or
-- with chemical fertilizers.
Q. Dr. Dreher, you indicated that
they -- the church itself believes in biblical authority for their diet. Did
you find that there is a biblical authority or biblical guideline for virtually
everything they do within their life style?
A. Well, certainly for most of what
they do within their life style the bible is a guide. And, actually, the reasoning
that goes on among members of the church is interpretation of biblical scriptures
and how that applies to -- not only to their life style, but to the reactions of
other people to their life style.
Q. Dr. Dreher, did you find an organized
study of the bible by the members?
A. Well, what do you mean by "organized"?
Q. Let me ask you this: Was there
an organized discussion of the bible on a regular basis by the members of the church?
A. There was constant discussion
of the bible by members of the church. "Organize" is not quite the
way I would choose to describe it, but it's -- it's not systematic in the sense
that there are formal kinds of classes set up or seminars or anything like that,
but the bible is a part of practically every discussion that takes place among members
of the church.
Q. You used the term "reasoning."
Dr. Dreher, what would a reasoning be? How would you describe that?
A. Reasoning is a theological discussion
among members of the church, but for the most part only men of the church.
While the men are reasoning and engaging in this theological
discourse, the women are expected to sit around the perimeters and not to join in
the discussion. The reasoning is the -- perhaps the less formal type of communication
or prayer.
The oblations are the more formalized method of Prayer.
The oblations start at between 4:30 and 5:00 in the morning and continue
until 8:00 -- 7:30, then they start again at 3:00 in the afternoon and continue
until 5:00 and then they start again at 8:00 in the evening and continue until about
11:00. And during the oblations -- well, each brother of the church is --
when he enters the church is given a chant or hymn, and essentially they are hymns,
they're just called chants within the framework of the church -- and each brother
raises a chant or a hymn, and then they -- the other members of the church join
him in singing this hymn.
During this time, of course, the chalice or sacred
pipe is passed among the members of the church, but again only the brethren.
The sisters have their own pipe.
Q. Durinq this oblation is there
reading of the bible and discussion of the bible?
A. There is a reading -- an interpretation
of the psalms of the bible, so it usually goes psalm, chant, psalm, chant, psalm,
chant for at least two and a half to three hours.
Q. How often would these oblations
take place?
A. Well, three times a day every
day.
Q. Seven days a week?
A. Seven days a week.
Q. Dr. Dreher, let's return to the
use of Ganja within the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church. I believe you mentioned
that the use of Ganja has assumed the role as the sacrament of the church, is that
correct?
A. That's correct.
Q. Would you explain that more fully
for the Court, please?
A. Okay -- and by the way, it's not
a sacrament just for the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church. It is generally recognized
among other Rastafarian sects that this is the sacrament.
The sacrament is a form of communion that is, if Jesus
is in ourselves or is in other man -- other men, then this communication should
allow you to become closer to Jesus and communication with yourself as well.
Ganja is seen as the sacred substance that enhances
that communication and brings you in closer communication with God or Jes-us.
Q. Is Ganja used only at certain
times by the Coptics or is it used generally all of the time, or can you answer
that?
A. It's used throughout the day;
when the brothers are reasoning, during oblation and also during work.
The belief is that Ganja is a good, natural, holy
substance and will make you then work harder if you are smoking it while you work.
So it's virtually used all day long. The only -- but it's not an indiscriminate
use. If a brother has in some way violated a rule of the church or acted
in a way that the elders of the church find unbecoming or disruptive, an injunction
is put on that person and they are not to pass the pipe and they are not allowed
to smoke any Ganja.
When -- women, for example, are in separation durinq
their menses or after having a baby. They are again considered unclean and
not permitted to either touch the bible or smoke marijuana.
So, yes, it is virtually used all the time, but not
indiscriminately and not everyone has access to it.
Q. Dr. Dreher, marijuana is sometimes
referred to as a recreational drug. Have you ever experienced or seen the
Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church use Ganja or marijuana in any recreational activity
or way?
A. I think the -- that the -- the
Coptic Church would reject the notion -- in any way would reject the notion that
they are using it recreationally. I have never seen them use Ganja recreationally.
I think it would be opposite to the tenets of the church; thoroughly, unacceptable.
It is used recreationally in Jamaica in general, but
certainly not among the Rastafarian groups.
Q. By the Coptics themselves are
you then saying that Ganja is used only for religious purposes?
A. I would say only for religious
purposes and for purposes of health.
Q. For purposes of health. Is this
directly tied in with their religious belief?
A. It is. It's described as
God's medicine and therefore is boiled in teas, is boiled into various kinds of
medicines and tonics and potions. It's applied topically to cuts, sores, bruises,
burns. It has -- enjoys qeneral widespread use among this group.
Q. Have you ever seen it used as
seasoning on foods?
A. Not to season foods; it's cooked
in foods, cooked in soup, for example.
Q. Dr. Dreher, about how long did
you have an opportunity to study the church in Miami Beach, Florida?
A. I would say altoqether about five
days.
Q. Do you feel that you had a sufficient
basis for observation to make --
A. Yes.
Q. -- certain objective statements
about that church?
A. As an anthropologist I would always
love to have more time to study a particular group, but this -- it was not difficult
to -- unlike other anthropological studies, it was not difficult to obtain access
to this group and to immediately start asking what I would consider as an anthropologist
the most vital questions. I had access to all the members and I also -- well,
not in Miami, but in the Jamaican gospel camp, was able to interview people who
were outside the church so that I could get a total picture of this church.
Q. There was no language barrier
preventing you from asking questions in Miami?
A. I speak and understand the Jamaican
patois so I could understand the Jamaican members as well as the white, american
members.
Q. Did you conduct any physical testing
of any kind, doctor?
A. No, I didn't.
Q. It was a speaking interview?
Is that the proper way to put it?
A. Speaking interviews, direct observations,
interviews with the non-coptics, observations of the oblations.
Q. Dr. Dreher, the coptic church
in Jamaica is primarily a black church, is it not?
A. Yes, it is.
Q. The Rastafarian movement is primarly
a black movement, is it not?
A. Actually, this is the only sect
that allows white members.
Q. Dr. Dreher, you indicated that
the religion arose in the late 1920s early 1930s through Marcus Garvey. Does
the church itself trace its history further back than that period of time?
A. Well, they certainly trace an
ideological history back to the beginnings of Christianity. I think every
church has a myth -- an idiological myth that's attached to it. It's part
of the definition of being a church. So the church -- it certainly has an
ideological history which would stretch back that far, but, in fact, the actual
origins -- the practical physical origins of the church one could say came in the
early 1930s.
Q. In relation to other recognized
churches in this particular country, is that considered to be quite young, quite
old or someplace in between?
A. I don't -- I would say it's someplace
in between. It's certainly not of very recent development. I think it's
a young church, but I can think of several churches in New York City that are younger
than that one and yet have a full-blown congregation, a system of belief that falls
well within the definition of religion.
Q. Dr. Dreher, in the academic community
is there general agreement or disagreement as to the validitv of this organization;
by that, the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church as a church organization?
A. Well, I -- I have conversed with
two other anthropologists. Two of them have been to visit the church.
We have agreed that this is a church, and I -- I would put money on another anthropologist
going down and finding that it wasn't a church. I think it falls well within
the accepted anthropological definitions of a church.
Q. Dr. Dreher, does the organization
that you found in Miami, likewise, fall within this definition of a church?
A. Well, I wouldn't call them two
separate churches. I would say that it's a satellite; a branch of the main
church that's in Jamaica.
Q. Therefore you found this organization
in Florida also to be within the bounds of being a church?
A. Well, yes, and they were consistent
with the practices and beliefs of the church in Jamaica; they performed oblations,
they ate natural food, the sisters and brothers still functioned along the same
kind of demeanor and deportment.
Q. Did you have occasion to meet
or to recognize Mr. Carl Eric Olsen during your studies of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic
Church?
A. I met Carl -- I'm not sure whether
it was the December trip or the March trip, but yes, I did -- we met.
Q. Where was that?
A. That was at 43 Star Island in
Miami.
Q. That is the Miami headquarters
of the Coptic Church?
A. That's right.
Q. Do you know Mr. Olsen personally
or have you ever had a chance to interview him or analyze him?
A. Not separately from the rest of
the members, but I've heard him in reasoning with the other brothers, and he's been
identified to me by other members as a brethrened member of the church.
Q. Dr. Dreher, did you have an opportunity
to ascertain who is the head of the Coptic Church in America?
A. Well, the brothers themselves
might say that every -- that -- paint a very democratic picture of the church, but,
in fact, if you look at who lights whose chalice, there is a hierarchical system
and a kind of pecking order within the church. And I would have to say that
in Jamaica, Keith Gordon is the head of the church, and the other two elders that
are very -- other brothers that are close to him are Brother Wally and Brother Sampson.
And if Keith was in the United States, he would be recognized as the head of the
church. In the United States I would say that Brother Louv is commonly recognized
as the head of the church.
MR. COOK: I have no
further questions, Dr. Dreher.
CROSS-EXAMINATION
BY MR. PETERSEN:
Q. Doctor, do I understand that this
is a male dominated church?
A. Not necessarily in terms of its
membership, but in terms of its rules. They believe that God is the head of
man and man is the head of woman.
Q. Could you give me an idea of a
breakdown of the membership as to percentages between men and women?
A. I'm not sure I can do that.
In the United States there tend to be more men than women. And I think there
are about a couple hundred -- these are real guesstimates, you know -- couple hundred
members in the United States. In Jamaica I would say there are more women
than men, or at least as many, and there are a couple thousand members in Jamaica.
The church is very strict about fornication, so that
until the -- a man decides to take a wife, he has to remain abstinent. So,
that I think that there is a general movement for people to find a wife once they
have the stability to do so, and it really evens up the sexual ratios.
Children that are born into the church -- always seems
to be more women born than men in Jamaica, so they also keep it in balance, in a
way.
Q. Dr. Dreher, in previous testimony
Brother Louv or Mr. Reilly testified that there were 25,000 members in the Ethiopian
Zion Coptic Church. Now, he didn't break it down between the United States
and Jamaica. Would that be an overestimate of both churches or approximately
accurate?
A. I would frankly say that that
was an overestimate. It is probably an estimate that many of the church members
would give, but it's -- and it's very difficult to estimate, certainly difficult
to estimate. I would say that's an underestimate for the Rastafarian movement
and perhaps an overestimate for this particular sect.
Q. Would the couple thousand members
you previously indicated be more accurate?
A. Well, according to me it would
be more accurate.
Q. Would the persons in charge of
the church tend to be predominantly men?
A. Always would be men.
Q. In your study did you have an
opportunity to examine the internal financial management of the church in Miami?
A. No, I didn't. That really
was not my charge. I was more interested in whether this church actually fell
-- fell into the definition of religion.
Q. Did you have an opportunity to
study -- I believe you referred to the growing of natural herbs and things with
natural fertilizer. Do they grow their own Ganja?
A. They used to. They used
to plant a good deal of Ganja on their property in Jamaica but they were continually
being raided by police so that they stopped qrowing it there and now purchase the
marijuana which they smoke from small farmers in the area.
Q. Would those small farmers use
the same kinds of natural fertilizer and perhaps primitive agricultural techniques?
A. Definitely.
Q. Do the priests in the church have
any particular life style or vow of poverty?
A. No, not at all. They have
-- certainly have a kind of life style, but not the vows of poverty.
Q. What would the role, for example,
of a Cadillac or a Mercedes-Benz have in the life of a priest?
A. To get them to where they're going.
They wouldn't -- they would consider that as priests, or for anyone, actually,
that every person deserves the very best that they can get. And, in fact,
I raised that question with one brother and he said, given the way that Babylons
-- that's us -- and all the dead spirits operate and the consumption of dead spirits
-- that's alcohol -- that one needs the safest, best car that one can -- can have.
Q. You have seen priests in Mercedes-Benz
and Cadillacs?
A. I have seen priests with Mercedes-Benzes.
I have never seen one with a Cadillac.
Q. What role does cash play in the
church?
A. Well, the church is an entirely
cash-run organization. Again, they do not subscribe to the institutions of
Babylon; that is, banks and mortgages and so forth, although they do recognize that
on certain occasions they have to use these just for practicality. But in
Jamaica, and I believe here as well, it's a completely cash-operated church.
Q. Did you have any opportunity to
observe any cash being passed between any of the hierarchy of the church and any
of the priests of the church?
A. The hierarchy of the church and
the priests?
Q. For example, if a priest were
going on a trip, would there be, let's say, an allowance given to the priest for
the trip?
A. That's quite likely. I have not
only seen cash passed from, say, the elders -- and this -- this amount of cash or
the goods that are transferred are not the decision of one elder, but in a council
of priests. People they -- the priests decide how much an individual is to
have, what kind of car they are to have. But all of the remains, even the
automobiles and the houses, at least in Jamaica -- those are the ones I know about
-- remain with the property of the church.
Q. Do you understand, though, that
the automobiles are actually titled to the individual priests and not to the church?
A. Uh-huh. That may be true,
but it's not true in Jamaica. I don't know about the United States.
MR. PETERSEN:
No further questions.
MR. COOK: I have
a few more questions.
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. COOK:
Q. Dr. Dreher, you said that there
is no specific vow of poverty by the priests of this church, and later you testified
that such personal items as cash, cars, et cetera, remain the property of the church.
Is there a novelty there? Does a priest own anything that you are aware of?
A. I think priests do own things,
but -- and are permitted to own things. They may own things before they come
to the church. But for the most part, the goods are passed to other members
and one has to warrant them or merit them, and they remain property of the church,
but it's -it's quite likely that titles are individually held. Certainly the
property in Miami was individually held.
Q. Dr. Dreher, when you speak of
this organization being a cash organization, in your own mind, does that have anything
to do with the makeup of the leaders of the church in Jamaica?
A. Well, I -- actually, I think that's
the reason it's a cash operation. The elders in Jamaica are, for the most
part, illiterate. They came from the rural Jamaican country side. They
have not been schooled, although they are very bright and they know a lot about
-- certainly, how to make change, so that they deal in what they know. They
certainly can't write checks or sign mortgages or do all those other things, or
certainly read a mortgage, so that they prefer to, and do, deal in cash, but that's
not unusual in Jamaica. That's typical of other groups of churches as well.
Q. Has this use of cash and this
distrust of society's institutions, such as banks, become a part of the doctrine
of this church?
A. I believe it's been incorporated
into the doctrine so it's like any religion; there is a relationship -- an ongoing
relationship between the religion's relationship to society and its doctrine.
MR. COOK: I have
no further questions.
MR. PETERSEN:
No recross.
THE COURT: You
are excused. Thank you, ma'am.